argus-2.0.0m

[Carter Bullard]

Hey Peter,
   One thing we can do to improve performance
is to modify some of the queue processing parameters.
Lets try these simple changes to see if we don't
see better packet loss numbers.

Index: ArgusModeler.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/argus/server/ArgusModeler.c,v
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -r1.68 ArgusModeler.c
81,84c81,82
< //    Argusdflag = 0;
<
<       ArgusUpdateInterval.tv_sec  = 1;
<       ArgusUpdateInterval.tv_usec = 0;
---
>       ArgusUpdateInterval.tv_sec  = 0;
>       ArgusUpdateInterval.tv_usec = 250000;
113c111
<    ArgusFlowQueue = ArgusNewQueue(128);
---
>    ArgusFlowQueue = ArgusNewQueue(1024);


Index: ArgusUtil.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/argus/server/ArgusUtil.c,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -r1.32 ArgusUtil.c
420c420
< #define ARGUS_MAXQSCAN  2048
---
> #define ARGUS_MAXQSCAN  256


Carter

Carter Bullard
QoSient, LLC
300 E. 56th Street, Suite 17A
New York, New York  10022

carter at qosient.com
Phone +1 212 813-9426
Fax   +1 212 813-9426


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-argus at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
[mailto:owner-argus at lists.andrew.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of Peter Van Epp
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 11:44 AM
To: argus
Subject: Re: argus-2.0.0m


	Yep that looks to have done it for the HUPs, its worked fine every time
so far. There does look to be a performance or measurement issue at 100
though:

-rw-r--r--   1 root     other      38004 Oct  4 08:15 argus.2.1
-rw-r--r--   1 root     other      36352 Oct  4 08:18 argus.log.2.100
-rw-r--r--   1 root     other      38004 Oct  4 08:13 argus.log.1.1
-rw-r--r--   1 root     other      37872 Oct  4 08:12 argus.log.1.100

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/argus/attachments/20001004/566ec2f5/attachment.html>